Fees only one part of default fund debate

The fees issue is just one of many around how to get the best out of KiwiSaver default funds, according to Savings Working Group member Paul Mersi.

While the current default fund system isn’t up for review until 2014, the Green Party’s election policy of creating a “public option” default fund managed by the Guardians of the New Zealand Superannuation fund has put the issue into the spotlight.

The Savings Working Group, which was set up by the government to look at policy around savings, mooted a similar policy but didn’t make a recommendation either way.

“We had a view that it was worth looking at but we didn’t have the time or resources to fully investigate that,” Mersi said.

“The government’s got this product where there are a lot of people coming in who don’t care who the provider is.  Our perspective was that one fund, five to six times bigger might be able to be of sufficient scale to paddle in bigger pools and deliver low fees.

“The level of fees is only one bit of it – the other bit is to make sure that they have an asset mix that is appropriate to their circumstances.  There needs to be a more structured approach to tailoring people’s assets to people’s age.”

Mersi said it was proving harder than expected to shift people out of default funds and the managers of the funds weren’t finding them as lucrative in that regard as they’d hoped.

He said the default fund issue would need sorting regardless of which party won the election, and it would be particularly important if KiwiSaver became compulsory as many thousands more would end up in default funds.

“If you’re going to be sucking more people into the machine there’s actually an increased responsibility to make sure the machine you’re sucking them into is the best it can be.”

KiwiSaver not too big for sharemarket (yet)

Fears that KiwiSaver could swamp New Zealand’s small stock market are a long way from being realised, according to new research on the sector.

Morningstar’s Sector Wrap, which shows Australian-invested funds didn’t have a great year, also shows that, while it is growing fast, KiwiSaver is far from being big enough to cause pricing distortions on the NZX.

“The KiwiSaver retirement savings scheme is the only area of the New Zealand investments industry consistently attracting net inflows,” the report says.

“Several commentators have suggested that the weight of money flowing into KiwiSaver options could put further pressure on the already constrained New Zealand sharemarket, driving up share valuations.”

In the four years that the KiwiSaver scheme has been in operation, over $1 billion has been allocated to the New Zealand sharemarket, according to the report.

“Over the 18 months to 30 June 2011, the dollar value traded on the NZX was approximately $35.5 billion. KiwiSaver has attracted inflows of $3.67 billion.

“At an average allocation to New Zealand equities of 12.5%, KiwiSaver flows over these 18 months therefore represented less than 1.5% of market volume.

“This suggests that despite there being significant KiwiSaver inflows to allocate, the proportion flowing into the New Zealand sharemarket is reasonable compared to both total market capitalisation and trading volume.”

The report found that over the past two years, the percentage of KiwiSaver assets allocated to New Zealand equities has increased from an average of 10.4% to 12.35%.

From just under $100 million at 30 June 2008, funds allocated to New Zealand equities increased tenfold to over $1 billion by 30 June 2011.

“Although not especially significant in the context of a $50.0 billion market-cap, the effect of the regular KiwiSaver funds flows is relentless.”

During this same period, KiwiSaver funds roughly tripled their allocation to Australian equities from two to six percent, with funds increasing over 25 times from about $20 million at 30 June 2008 to more than $500 million by June 30.