The NZ Herald published a feature article on retirement income savings on February 28. The author was strongly critical of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund’s construct and recent performance. In response, Adrian Orr chief executive of the Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation had the following to say:

The fund is a simple concept. The government has legislated to invest money today to gain a return over the long-term. That return is to be used in the future to smooth the tax burden of the rising cost of superannuation income. One measure of financial success is whether the returns to the fund over decades are above the cost of government borrowing. This may or may not be the case over any randomly selected day, week, month, or year. In keeping with that we have deliberately and repeatedly highlighted the wide range of year-to-year outcomes we expect over the life-time of the fund, including negative ones. We have used our annual reports to illustrate this. A government is in a great position to benefit from investing over decades, more so than any individual. It can focus on the long-term and hence make investment decisions not available to many. It has the ability to ride out the tough patches and avoid ‘fire sales’. And, it can fund this activity at the cheapest rate and receive the tax on its local investment. The chance of investment success is as good as it can get. Right now, the earnings prospects for long-term investors have improved significantly. This is great for the Super Fund with the majority of contributions ahead. The global recession has seen asset prices fall and the rewards for accepting investment risk rise to historical levels. History also teaches us that the best time for investment returns is after significant downward corrections. However, we do not manage the portfolio around expectations of near-term events. Forecasting short-term is near impossible and leads to a lot of cost and lost opportunities. Exactly when a boom or bust will happen, what will trigger it, how it will unfold, and what the investment implications might be can not be forecast with useful precision – otherwise they would not happen. The forecasts the author of the feature article mentioned are long-term returns. Likewise, putting money only into cash or fixed interest dooms the fund to failure from the outset. The future retirement income liabilities, which follow nominal wages, will outpace the returns. Instead, the fund is invested for the long-term across a very wide range of assets that give us the best chance of buffering rising future retirement income payments. Diversification is the best means of managing investment risk. Imagine if we only had one asset and it happened to be the worst performing. A diversified portfolio removes that risk. And, we spend a lot of time on investment manager due diligence. Furthermore, whether a government’s operating accounts are in surplus or deficit makes no difference to the investment proposition of the fund. Neither do the returns to the Fund impact on the variability of the government’s debt program. The Guardians’ legislation was designed to provide clarity of purpose, operational independence, and transparency. It is recognised internationally for those features. When I took over two years ago following my role at the Reserve Bank, I inherited a set of investment assets selected to grow and to weather the long-term. These were chosen on a set of investment beliefs. Since then, we have been able to attract and retain world class people, and continue to implement a significant NZ and global investment strategy. We greatly increased our ability to manage and monitor our risk and liquidity, and invest in market-tracking indices, so that we are cost-effective and can avoid being forced to sell illiquid assets. We have raised the hurdle on our investment managers and let some go, and we have introduced tougher due diligence processes. And, we have deliberately reconsidered our global private equity and property strategies. Finally, we have benchmarked ourselves against the best in class long-term investing fraternity. They have all experienced the same challenges and remain committed to long-term investing. These are testing times which create the opportunities for long-term investors.

The government is proposing further changes to super schemes in line with its aim of encouraging greater savings, Finance Minister Michael Cullen, Commerce Minister Lianne Dalziel, State Services Minister Annette King and Revenue Minister Peter Dunne announced today.

“The amendments we propose will give those in super schemes that comply with KiwiSaver rules more protection and allow savers better access to their funds in retirement,” the Ministers said.

“It is important that existing schemes which wish to become KiwiSaver-complying face the same rules as KiwiSaver schemes.”

The Ministers said the changes were a small but significant fine-tuning of proposed KiwiSaver legislation.

“The ideal time to make these adjustments is now, while a Bill dealing with KiwiSaver legislation is before Parliament.”

The changes include:
Requiring complying funds as well as KiwiSaver funds to lodge employer participation agreements with the Government Actuary. Employer participation agreements set out conditions under which employees are scheme members. This measure will give greater protection to employees, by ensuring there is government oversight of employers’ involvement in these funds.
Allowing benefits in complying superannuation funds to be withdrawn as a lump sum. This will give members of complying schemes the choice of taking a lump sum or buying an annuity when they are eligible to access their savings, a provision which already applies to KiwiSaver schemes. As legislation stands, members of complying superannuation funds may be forced to buy annuities at extra cost.
Avoiding “double-dipping”. Members of some existing superannuation schemes in the State sector already receive a contribution from the Crown as their employer. This will continue unchanged. However the legislation will be amended to provide extra assurance that if these people also join KiwiSaver they will not be able to receive additional employer contributions.

As well, as previously announced, the legislation will be amended to make sure that people receive the member tax credit of up to $20 a week from the time they join KiwiSaver. As the legislation is currently worded, some KiwiSaver members would not become eligible for the tax credit until several weeks after they began making contributions.

Under the proposed law change, the member tax credit will apply from the first of the month in which the contribution is made, so that, for example, all contributions that begin in July will be matched by a tax credit from 1 July.

“We are confident these changes will further strengthen KiwiSaver, and make it a more attractive proposition for New Zealanders wishing to secure a more comfortable retirement,” said the Ministers.

The changes will be added to the Taxation (Annual Rates, Business Taxation, KiwiSaver and Remedial Matters) Bill, which is currently before Parliament.

Don’t Dismantle KiwiSaver To Pay For Tax Cuts For High Income Earners

“KiwiSaver is good news for many workers, and the government and employer
contributions shouldn’t be scrapped to help National pay for tax cuts that
deliver the biggest benefits to those on high incomes,” CTU secretary Carol
Beaumont said yesterday.

“The main income issue for low and middle income workers is the need for
better wages, and strengthening collective bargaining so that low wages can be
addressed at an industry level by workers and employers. CTU unions are
actively working on that while the National Party is significantly silent.”

“There is strong interest in KiwiSaver from workers, and unions are working
hard to make sure their members know about their entitlements and get the best
opportunities to benefit from Kiwisaver.”

“Yes there are problems for those on low wages, and the CTU has consistently
argued for easier access for low-income workers into KiwiSaver, and will still
argue for a 2% minimum contribution option.”

“The introduction of a 4% employer contribution to workplace savings phased
in over the next 4 years means New Zealand workers can start to catch up with
their Australian colleagues where a 9% employer contribution is required.
This is excellent news for many workers, and we hope it stays.”